Wednesday 28 November 2012

In it for the dogs.....?



You may have noticed in an earlier post that I touched on the fact that Mrs Lambert and her merry men like to break into breeding kennels, film dogs then leave them for months until a tv programme is to be made. It should be noted that only when a generic email goes out to the public from the tv producers puppy love respond to present their findings. 
 
Lets look in depth at some of their exposures, Sky news where one of the properties stated publicly the situation filmed had been going on for 8 months, so did this alleged caring group of dog lovers leave these dogs in that situation for 8 months........? yep they sure did as Sky or any other TV company has to view the premises personally before they go public.......they have to, after all the pictures and film could be of any premises, in light of this, surely it makes puppy love and all involved who knew about the situation complicit in animal suffering for the sake of a TV programme. If puppy love really cared about those animals, why not just call the RSPCA to get the dogs out?
 

Puppy Love do not care for the dogs they represent!

Lets examine the suffering, OK I agree it does not look how I like to keep my dog,  the dogs do look bewildered, but come off it..... wouldn't you be if a stranger crept into your bedroom and started taking pictures of you in the middle of the night? Under cover filming in black and white with a tiny camcorder would make any place look dark and dinghy and the most beautiful person look a mong..........(even Ms Lambert believe it or not) don't forget they stated that while somebody kept the owner talking they took some more undercover film.
 
Breaking the law!
The original film taken MONTHS earlier, that was taken to get a reporters interest would have been taken by trespass,  while the owners were out, ( another law broken by puppy love)how do they know that when the owners are home, the dogs are not running free on the yard? It seems reasonably responsible to me to shut your dogs up when you go out. 
All these were County Council licensed premises, in the first instance why did they not ring the local CC to get immediate improvement for these dogs or could it be that the premises and alleged suffering were not as bad as the film made it look? They did not contact the CC as they wanted the dogs left insitu until the programme aired! All for the glory.
 
Is this what a responsible dog loving organisation would do? This one did. Somehow I think the dogs trust would not do the same. Now theres a group of people that put there money where their mouth is and make a difference to dogs in the United Kingdom.
 
One question that sticks in my mind is, are these conditions staged? 
 
Until next time...
Woof x

15 comments:

  1. Desperation at Puppy Love Campaigns. Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer. Don't worry Mr P Gane I am sure your time will come. Your desperation for attention is obviously oozing from your pores. Be careful what you wish for, it may just come true.

    ;-)

    Woof xx

    ReplyDelete
  2. Whoever you are running this blog your certainly putting a new perspective on things relating to this puppy love lot. Looks like they really are in it for the glory and as for p gane, what can one say about him except he's a total nurd desperately seeking attention. What a plonker!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is eye opening and it makes sense, TV producers cannot take their word for conditions and have to view things for their selves, that is with anything not just puppies,how can they sleep at night knowing what they do in the name of "making people aware of it" why not just name and shame bad breeders rather than just get film.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lambert has so much bluff she leads people to believe she can pick up the phone and get a reporter there asap, she has no more pull than any member of Joe public ringing them up with a story line.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And they call it puppy love? Yeah right !

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have actually reported 2 puppy farmers to puppy love campaigns via their facebook page and they did nothing !

    ReplyDelete
  7. I did watch this Sky prog, and was upset at the two cockers running round in panic, I never put it down to them being scared of strangers in their home, I will think twice before believing the worst next time, I hope puppylove realises they scared these dogs wittless for a bloody bit of film!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. It does become clear when you stop to think rationally, that these dogs are in fact traumatised by the persons filming, they are hiding behind the basket at the back of the pen and trying to climb the back wall, to get away from them. These are probably normal, friendly approachable dogs to their owner, and if the owner was present totally different. But it made a good shock horror story, I would suspect the vet making comments never thought of that angle or cause for their adverse behaviour, I hope the person filming takes responsibility for traumatising these animals, I doubt they will as they live in cloud cuckoo land.
    I guess they will bang on about the supposedly "dead" puppy, it was probably fast asleep and not as sensitive a nature as the other animals, or being all white could have been deaf so not respond to the commotion , it is so much more dramatic to claim it being dead, funny how nobody bothered to stop and find out, or draw it to the attention of the owner just in case it needed medical assistance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do agree with you about the dogs trying to get away from the people filming, the kennel conditions don't look the best but instead of blaming others why didn't puppylove and the activists stand outside the premises doing a demo to bring it to the public attention in the locality that would hit where it hurts? it would have a lot more impact than leaving them to be filmed which did nothing to help them.

      Delete
  9. I have a 14 year old daughter who is going through an attention seeking stage.
    The Mrs and I have put it down to growing up, feeling insecure, bullying, finding it hard to cope with the ever changing pressures of life, hormones and fitting 'IN' with the crowd.
    Sounds familiar doesn't it? PL all over I think!

    Now the major difference here is a gap in age of around 50 years, Oh and the fact that my daughter will grow out of it.
    You would think by now that PL would by winding down and taking it a bit easy.
    Just think in a couple of more years you will all be back in nappies and sat in a bouncy chair - That's if your not already

    ReplyDelete
  10. It does make me chuckle. These poor people over the examiner towers still think this blog is ran by dogs 4 us. They also claim that this blog is lies. Excuse me but there is not one lie written about puppylovecampaigns at all here! The truth hurts.

    Woof xx

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pl have had various kennels reported to them but as they are licensed and have a website of nice kennels they have not done anything or any investigations! They recently portray to the public that they helped with a load of dogs being rescued from builders buckets. News flash pl had NOTHING to do with this. It was all RSPCA and police. Look at the photo with all who involved. No Veronica lambert! Despite this they are conning the public and letting on that they did more than they did. All they got was some paperwork from people that bought dogs. She was not actively involved. Glory hunters and attention seekers. That's all they are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep I noticed how they cut and just pasted the piece so it started with " I obtained a warrant under the 2006 animal welfare act along with the RSPCA" so people would assume puppylove were involved.Silly ole bag is to obssesed with being an interent troll to do any real good.
      And your right about complaints not being followed up, I heard they have loads of reports about commercial breeders but the places were too clean for a visual impact so are just left.

      Delete
    2. Even though Puppy Love Campaigns and the crazy geng as they call themselves say lies are written on this blog, the only 'lie' they can find is about what the anonymous pster wrote about Veronica Lambert portraying that she helped with the recent investigation in Manchester. Well I have looked myself and can sayif I didnt know better she made it out as if you did more than help the buyers. Interfering busy bodies more like!
      And if thats the only thing you can cry about you just shot yourself in the foot! You have confirmed to readers that nothing published by exposed is lies.

      We will continue to expose the truth!

      Delete
  12. On the puppylove facebook page Lambert is banging on about people supporting the conditions of the dogs in these establishments, OPEN YOUR EYES DIPSTICK! and stop twisting things! we are banging on about your suspicious way of getting films that leave animal's traumatised, although you don't address the issue, not one person on here has said the conditions were good.
    You mask all criticism with " the poor dogs" not accepting you hurt these poor dogs just to get some bloody film !

    ReplyDelete