You may have noticed in an earlier post that I touched on the fact that Mrs Lambert and her merry men like to break into breeding kennels, film dogs then leave them for months until a tv programme is to be made. It should be noted that only when a generic email goes out to the public from the tv producers puppy love respond to present their findings.
Lets look in depth at some of their exposures, Sky news where one of the properties stated publicly the situation filmed had been going on for 8 months, so did this alleged caring group of dog lovers leave these dogs in that situation for 8 months........? yep they sure did as Sky or any other TV company has to view the premises personally before they go public.......they have to, after all the pictures and film could be of any premises, in light of this, surely it makes puppy love and all involved who knew about the situation complicit in animal suffering for the sake of a TV programme. If puppy love really cared about those animals, why not just call the RSPCA to get the dogs out?
Puppy Love do not care for the dogs they represent!
Lets examine the suffering, OK I agree it does not look how I like to keep my dog, the dogs do look bewildered, but come off it..... wouldn't you be if a stranger crept into your bedroom and started taking pictures of you in the middle of the night? Under cover filming in black and white with a tiny camcorder would make any place look dark and dinghy and the most beautiful person look a mong..........(even Ms Lambert believe it or not) don't forget they stated that while somebody kept the owner talking they took some more undercover film.
Breaking the law!
The original film taken MONTHS earlier, that was taken to get a reporters interest would have been taken by trespass, while the owners were out, ( another law broken by puppy love)how do they know that when the owners are home, the dogs are not running free on the yard? It seems reasonably responsible to me to shut your dogs up when you go out.
All these were County Council licensed premises, in the first instance why did they not ring the local CC to get immediate improvement for these dogs or could it be that the premises and alleged suffering were not as bad as the film made it look? They did not contact the CC as they wanted the dogs left insitu until the programme aired! All for the glory.
Is this what a responsible dog loving organisation would do? This one did. Somehow I think the dogs trust would not do the same. Now theres a group of people that put there money where their mouth is and make a difference to dogs in the United Kingdom.
One question that sticks in my mind is, are these conditions staged?
Until next time...
Woof x
